Flowers v. Alameda County Sheriffs et al

Filing 59

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 57 SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
Flowers v. Alameda County Sheriffs et al Doc. 59 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. / JOSEPH J. FLOWERS, Plaintiff, No. C 08-04179 CW (PR) ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this action. The Court previously For denied Plaintiff's first request for appointment of counsel. the same reasons, Plaintiff's second request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket no. 57. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/1/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 JOSEPH J. FLOWERS, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: CV08-04179 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF et al, 7 Defendant. 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Joseph J. Flowers F82065 DVI Prison P.O. Box 600 Tracy, CA 95378 Dated: March 1, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 1, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?