Roe v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 26

ORDER re 25 granting STIPULATION for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/16/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JOHN L. BURRIS (SBN #69888) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 (510) 839-5200; FAX (510) 839-3882 Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043) JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968) Law Offices of James B. Chanin 3050 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California 94705 (510) 848-4752; FAX: (510) 848-5819 Email: jbcofc@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 vs. JANE ROE, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) CASE NO: C08-04228 CW ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CITY OF OAKLAND; RICHARD VALERGA; DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. Roe v. City Of Oakland, Case No. C08-04228 CW Stipulation And Proposed Order Re Dismissal with Prejudice 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE THAT pursuant to the terms of the settlement of the entire action reached between the parties, this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: April 1, 2009 ___________/S/____________________ James B. Chanin Attorney for Plaintiff ___________/S/____________________ William E. Simmons Attorney for Defendants Dated: April 6, 2009 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: April 16, 2009 _______________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN Judge of the United States District Court Roe v. City Of Oakland, Case No. C08-04228 CW Stipulation And Proposed Order Re Dismissal with Prejudice 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?