Kina v. United Air Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING PRIVATE ADR re 26 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR filed by United Air Lines, Inc., Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/5/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2009)

Download PDF
DEC.22.2008 03:00 415B648199 LegalAidSociety-EmploymentLawCtr #2164 P.002 /003 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN-DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATTHEW KINA, CASE NO. 3:08-cv-04358-PJH Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADK PROCESS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and the BETTY FORD CENTER, Defendants). Cpunse report that they have met arid conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R, 16-8 and AJJR T/.K, 3-5; Court processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADK L.R. 4) Karly Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) . (Note: Pea-ties who believe that an earfy settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their1 needs than any other form of ADR. must participate in an ADft'phone conference and may, not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADK Phone Conference. See Civil Local Ruk 16-8 and ADR LK, 3-5). Private Process: V .. Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _^. The parties have stipulated to private mediation. The parties agree U> hold the ADK session by: V the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.). other requested deadline Dated:. /A~ C^) "~ O$ Smey for PJ Matthew Dated :jkl&&> ' Dated: Attorney foi" Defendant Betty Ford Center Attorney for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. ... . . . . _^ 12-23-08 10:35AM FROM- T-588 P-. 02/03 F-222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATTHEW KINA, CASE NO. 3:08-cv~04358-PJH Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and the BETTY FORD CENTER, Defendants). / Counse report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R, 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R, 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR LR. 3-5), Private Process; V Private ADR (please identi^ process and provider), ,,_,, Tbc parties have stipulated to private mediation. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: V the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline Dated: Dated : (thill&. ' I' , Dated: / 2/3*2/<3 & Attorney for Defendant Betty Ford Center DEC.22.2008 03:00 4158648199 LegalAidSociety-EmploymentLawCtr #2164 P.003 /003 When filing this document .in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED! ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation X Private ADR Deadline for ADR session X 90 days from the date of this order. Other IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ER N F D IS T IC T O R Fiimwide:87864253.1 052664.1076 A C LI FO hyllis Judge P J. Hami lton R NIA 1/5/09 OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?