Jewel et al v. National Security Agency et al

Filing 210

ORDER GRANTING (107 in 4:13-cv-03287-JSW) and (207 in 4:08-cv-4373-JSW) STIPULATION for an Extension of Time To Process for Public Filing Certain Classified Declarations and for an Extension of Time To File a Rule 11 Certification Regarding Preservation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 21, 2014. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Branch Director
JAMES J. GILLIGAN
Special Litigation Counsel
MARCIA BERMAN
Senior Trial Counsel
BRYAN DEARINGER
Trial Attorney
RODNEY PATTON
Trial Attorney
JULIA BERMAN
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 6102
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

11
Attorneys for the Government Defendants
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
_______________________________________
)
)
Case No. 08-cv-4373-JSW
CAROLYN JEWEL, et al.,
)
Case No. 13-cv-3287-JSW
)
Plaintiffs,
)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
)
ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF
v.
)
TIME TO PROCESS FOR PUBLIC
FILING CERTAIN CLASSIFIED
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., )
)
DECLARATIONS AND FOR AN
)
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
Defendants.
FILE A RULE 11 CERTIFICATION
_______________________________________)
)
REGARDING PRESERVATION
)
IN FIRST UNITARIAN
FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF
)
LOS ANGELES, et al.,
)
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) & Civil L.R. 6-2
)
Courtroom 11, 19th Floor
Plaintiffs,
)
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
)
v.
)
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________________)

27
28
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page2 of 6

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) & Civil Local Rule 6-2, the

2

Government requests, and the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate

3

to and respectfully request that the Court (1) extend the time for the Government to complete its

4

classification review of certain classified declarations previously filed in Jewel v. National

5

Security Agency, Civ. No. 08-4373-JSW, Shubert v. Obama, Civ. No. 07-0693-JSW, and First

6

Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency, Civ. No. 13-3287-JSW; and

7

(2) extend the time for the Government to file its certification regarding preservation of evidence

8

pursuant to this Court’s March 21, 2014, Preservation Order in First Unitarian (ECF No. 103)

9

(“Preservation Order”).

10

(1) With respect to the first matter (classification review), the Government requires

11

additional time to comply with this Court’s order, entered at the hearing on March 19, 2014, that

12

the Government on or before April 21, 2014, identify, review, and process for public filing

13

certain classified declarations filed in the above-referenced cases to the extent that such

14

declarations contain information that has since been publicly disclosed by the Government.

15

Whereas the Government had previously completed a similar project concerning seven

16

previously classified declarations within the almost three months’ time the Court allowed for

17

compliance, see Jewel, 08-cv-4373-JSW, ECF No. 161 (Amended Civil Minute Order dated

18

Sept. 27, 2013), the Court’s order of March 19 required the completion of a similar process for

19

ten declarations in about one month.

20

The Government has not—despite significant efforts—been able to comply with the

21

Court’s order to complete its classification review of these ten declarations by April 21, 2014.

22

Significant information in the declarations remains highly classified, which must be separated

23

from any information that no longer remains classified. Each declaration must undergo several

24

layers of careful line-by-line review before public versions can be produced. These reviews also

25

require inter-agency consultation and coordination, which takes additional time and resources

26

from various governmental components that have a limited number of individuals who have the

27

experience and clearances necessary to perform these reviews. These individuals must conduct

28

these reviews in addition to other classification-review tasks such as complying with Freedom of
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW
2

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page3 of 6

1

Information Act (FOIA) requests and court-ordered deadlines in related FOIA litigation. For

2

these reasons, the Government respectfully requests, and Plaintiffs do not oppose, a two-week

3

extension until May 5, 2014, for the Government to complete its classification-review,

4

processing, and (as appropriate) public filing of the ten declarations that the Government has

5

identified as subject to the Court’s March 19 order.

6

(2) With respect to the second matter (preservation certification), the Government

7

requests a similar two-week extension of time to submit the certification required by this Court’s

8

Preservation Order in First Unitarian. That Order requires counsel for each party by April 21,

9

2014, to certify to the Court, under seal and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, that

10

the directive counsel are required, under paragraph E of the Order, to issue to their respective

11

clients has been carried out. From the date the Preservation Order was entered, Government

12

counsel and the defendant agencies have exercised due diligence in addressing every aspect of

13

that Order, including the provisions of paragraph E regarding practices of any party involving the

14

routine destruction, recycling, relocation, or mutation of materials that may be relevant to the

15

case, so as to be in a position to submit the required certification as directed. Notwithstanding

16

these efforts, in light of the need for coordination between various defendant agencies and

17

components, additional time is needed to complete the certification process.

18
19
20

The Government Defendants respectfully request, and Plaintiffs do not oppose, an
extension of that deadline from April 21 to May 5, 2014.
The Court has not set a hearing date for these matters. There have been no previous

21

requests to alter these deadlines, and the requested changes should not impact the overall

22

schedule of this case.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW
3

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page4 of 6

1
2
3

Dated: April 21, 2014
Respectfully Submitted,

4
5

STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

JOSEPH H. HUNT
Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Branch Director
MARCIA BERMAN
Senior Trial Counsel
[e-mail]
BRYAN DEARINGER
Trial Attorney
RODNEY PATTON
Trial Attorney
JULIA BERMAN
Trial Attorney
By: /s/ James J. Gilligan
JAMES J. GILLIGAN
Special Litigation Counsel
[e-mail]
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 6102
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

24
25

Attorneys for the Government Defendants
Sued in their Official Capacities

26
27
28
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW
4

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page5 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

By: /s/_____________
CINDY COHN
[e-mail]
LEE TIEN
KURT OPSAHL
JAMES S. TYRE
MARK RUMOLD
ANDREW CROCKER
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RICHARD R. WIEBE (SBN 121156)
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD R. WIEBE
One California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Jewel Plaintiffs

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW
5

Case4:08-cv-04373-JSW Document207 Filed04/21/14 Page6 of 6

1
* * * *

2
3
4
5
6

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1
I, James J. Gilligan, hereby declare pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 that I have obtained
Plaintiffs’ concurrence in the filing of this document from Cindy Cohn, counsel for Plaintiffs.
Executed on April 21, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

7

/s/ James J. Gilligan
JAMES J. GILLIGAN

8
9

* * * * *

10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, it is ORDERED that the Government’s deadline for

12

completing its classification review, processing, and (as appropriate) public filing, of the ten

13

declarations that the Government has identified as subject to the Court’s March 19 order be

14

extended from April 21 to May 5, 2014. Similarly, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, it is

15

ORDERED that the deadline of April 21 be extended to May 5, 2014, for the Government to

16

certify that the directive counsel are required to issue to their respective clients pursuant to

17

paragraph E of the Court’s Preservation Order in First Unitarian Order has been carried out.

18
19
20
21

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 21, 2014
Dated: ____________

________________________________
The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Stipulation and Proposed Order] in Jewel v. Nat’l Security Agency, 08-cv-4373-JSW; First Unitarian Church of Los
Angeles v. Nat’l Security Agency, 13-cv-3287-JSW
6