Cotton et al v. City of Eureka, California et al

Filing 135

ORDER Case Management Conference set for 9/23/2010 03:15 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/20/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2010)

Download PDF
Cotton et al v. City of Eureka, California et al Doc. 135 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No: C 08-4386 SBA ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE 4 SIEHNA M. COTTON, et al., 5 6 Plaintiffs, vs. 7 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. Trial in this case is scheduled to commence on October 4, 2010. Due to the Court's unavailability, trial cannot commence as scheduled. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The trial date of October 4, 2010 and the pretrial conference set for September 28, 2010, are VACATED. 2. The parties shall appear for a telephonic Case Management Conference on September 23, 2010, at 3:15 p.m. for the purpose of rescheduling the trial date. The parties shall meet and confer prior to the conference to discuss a new trial date for dates between November 8, 2010, and March 1, 2011. The parties shall file an updated joint Case Management Conference Statement by September 21, 2010, which indicates the parties' proposed dates for trial. The parties also should indicate whether they are willing to consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge of this Court, and if so, whether they prefer a general referral or a referral to a specific Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs shall be responsible for filing the statement as well as for arranging the conference call. All parties shall be on the line and shall call (510) 637-3559 at the above indicated date and time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 20, 2010 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?