Cotton et al v. City of Eureka, California et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the discovery cut-off for Plaintiff's Experts has been EXTENDED to 06/21/10. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 5/27/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010) Modified on 5/28/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 Brian E. Claypool (SBN 134674) The Claypool Law Firm th 1055 E. Colorado Blvd, 5 Floor Pasadena, CA 91106 Tel: (626) 240-4616 Fax: (626) 240-4617 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vicki I. Sarmiento, SBN 134047 333 N. Garfield Avenue Alhambra, California 91801 Tel: (626) 308-1171 Fax: (626) 308-1101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dale K. Galipo, SBN 144074 Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo 21800 Burbank Blvd., Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com Tel: (818) 347-3333 Fax: (818) 347-4118 Nancy K. Delaney, SBN 70617 Nicholas R. Kloeppel, SBN 186165 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE Attorneys at Law 814 Seventh Street P. O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 Tel: (707) 443-5643 Fax: (707) 444-9586 Attorneys for CITY OF EUREKA Defendants William R. Bragg BRAGG, PERLMAN, RUSS, STUNICH, RUDOLPH & EADS, LLP Attorneys at Law 1036 5th Street, Suite E P.O. Box 1248 Eureka, CA 95502 Tel: (707) 442-2927 Fax: (707) 443-2747 Attorneys for COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Defendants 1 ______________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SIEHNA M. COTTON, a minor, by Fungula Fumu Ngondji, her guardian ad litem; and MARTIN COTTON, SR., an individual, Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF EUREKA, CALIFORNIA, a political subdivision of the State of California; COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, CALIFORNIA, a political subdivision of the State of California, et al., Defendants. Plaintiffs have disclosed retained experts Roger Clark and Harry J. Bonnell, M.D. Defendants timely noticed the depositions of same for June 9, 2010, however, said experts were not available on that date. The experts are not available on the same date until June 18, 2010, a date that defense counsel is not available but defense counsel and the witnesses are available on June 21, 2010, nine days after the expert discovery cut-off. Other dates of availability within the discovery cut-off would require defense counsel to travel to Los Angeles, California, on two separate occasions or would require the witnesses to travel to the Bay Area, incurring additional and avoidable expenses for the parties. Based on the foregoing, the parties, through their attorneys, agree that the expert discovery cut-off for purposes of completing the depositions of plaintiffs' experts may be extended to June 21, 2010. /// /// CASE NO.: C 08-04386 SBA JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 2 ______________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATED: May 25, 2010 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM LAW OFFICES OF VICKI I. SARMIENTO LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO By: /s/ Vicki I. Sarmiento Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: May 25, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATED: May 25, 2010 BRAGG, PERLMAN, RUSS, STUNICH, RUDOLPH & EADS, LLP By: /s/ William R. Bragg Attorneys for County of Humboldt Defendants MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE By: /s/ Nancy K. Delaney Attorneys for City of Eureka Defendants ***** ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5/27/10 DATED: ________________ ______________________________________ Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Court 3 ______________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?