Davis et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 244

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 243 Stipulation Regarding Response and Reply Deadlines for Supplemental Motions in Limine. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Christopher Lundberg, OSB No. 941084
Matthew E. Malmsheimer, OSB No. 033847
Haglund Kelley LLP
200 S.W Market Street, Suite 1777
Portland, Oregon 97201
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
David Springfield, Calif. SBN 226630
The Springfield Law Firm
P.O. Box 660 / 12896 Rices Crossing Road
Oregon House, CA 95962
Tel.: [phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRENDA DAVIS

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16

BRENDA DAVIS and DAVID ROY,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,

17

v.
18
19

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS et al.,
Defendants.

20
21
22

Case No: 4:08-cv-04481-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor
Judge: The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
Trial Date: TBD
Action Filed: September 4, 2008

23
24
25

/// /// ///
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Case No. 4:08-cv-04481-SBA
-

1 -

1

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT:
2

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE undersigned counsel of record for plaintiffs

3
4

and defendants hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter the following order:
The parties have recently filed Supplemental Motions In Limine. Dkt. Nos. 234 &

5
6

237. The parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court set the deadline for Responses to

7

those Motions two weeks from the date of filing, with the deadline for filing any Reply three

8

weeks from the date of filing of the Supplemental Motion. For Dkt. No 234, that will make

9

Defendants' Response due on October 25, 2013 with Plaintiff's Reply, if any, due on November

10

1, 2013. For Dkt. No. 237, that will make Plaintiff's Response due on October 28,with

11

Defendants' Reply, if any, due on November 4, 2013. These deadlines will permit the parties to

12

address the issues raised in the Supplemental Motions in Limine, are consistent with the Court's

13

Standing order on Pretrial Preparation, and will not affect any of the other scheduled deadlines.

14

Accordingly, there is good cause for the request.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/// /// ///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Case No. 4:08-cv-04481-SBA
-

2 -

1

Respectfully submitted,
2
3

Dated: October 15th , 2013

4

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
Attorney General of California

5

By: /s/ Karen Kiyo Lowhurst
Karen Kiyo Lowhurst,
Bonnie Chen, Calif SBN 219349
Deputy Attorneys General
Attorneys for Defendants CDCR, Mandel, &
McCarthy

6
7
8
9
10

Dated: October 15th , 2013

HAGLUND KELLEY LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Christopher Lundberg____
Christopher Lundberg, Oregon OSB No. 941084
Matthew E. Malmsheimer, OSB No. 033847
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
David Springfield, Calif. SBN 226630
Attorneys for Plaintiff

13
14
15
16
17
18

Based on the agreement of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is SO

19

ORDERED. Defendants' Response to Dkt. No 234 is due on October 25, 2013, with Plaintiff's

20

Reply, if any, due on November 1, 2013. Plaintiff's Response to Dkt. No. 237 is due on October

21

28, with Defendants' Reply, if any, due on November 4, 2013.

22
23
24

10/16/2013
Dated: __________________

____________________________
SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Case No. 4:08-cv-04481-SBA
-

3 -

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 15th day of October, 2013, I served the foregoing Stipulation

3

and [Proposed] Order Regarding Response and Reply Deadlines for Supplemental Motions in
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Limine, on the following:
Karen Kiyo Lowhurst
Bonnie J. Chen
Deputy Attorneys General
1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor
PO Box 70550
Oakland CA 94612-0550
Attorneys for Defendants

11

by the following indicated method(s):
12
13
14

by mailing a full, true and correct copy thereof in a sealed first-class postage prepaid
envelope, addressed to the foregoing attorney(s) at the last known office address of the
attorney(s), and deposited with the United States Post Office at Portland, Oregon on the
date set forth above.

15
16

by causing a full, true and correct copy thereof to be hand delivered to the attorney(s) at
the last known address listed above on the date set forth above.

17
18
19
20

by sending a full, true and correct copy thereof via overnight mail in a sealed, prepaid
envelope, addressed to the attorney(s) as shown above on the date set forth above.
by faxing a full, true and correct copy thereof to the attorney(s) at the fax number shown
above, which is the last-known fax number for the attorney(s)’ office on the date set forth
above.

21
22

by transmitting full, true and correct copies thereof to the attorney(s) through the court’s
Cm/ECF system on the date set forth above.

23
24

/s/Matthew E. Malmsheimer

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Case No. 4:08-cv-04481-SBA
-

4 -