Davis et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 49

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 37 Motion to Compel. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2009) Modified on 9/8/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 2. Following a telephone conference on September 3, 2009, at which all parties were represented by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' motion to compel plaintiffs' response to interrogatories is WITHDRAWN. Defendants' motion for additional deposition time is GRANTED. The depositions may proceed for more than one BRENDA DAVIS and DAVID ROY, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) v. ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPT. ) ) OF CORRECTIONS AND ) REHABILITATION, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C08-4481 SBA (BZ) SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER day so long as the questioning is productive. In the absence of agreement all depositions shall take place in or near Crescent City, California. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Defendant's request for reimbursement of expenses is DENIED. This Order resolves Docket No. 37. Dated: September 4, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge G:\BZALL\-REFS\DAVIS V. ST. OF CALIF\DISC 2 ORD.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?