Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2Micro International Limited

Filing 478

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 471 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)

1
2
3
4

LATHAM & WATKINS L.L.P.
Mark A. Flagel (State Bar No. 110635)
Bob Steinberg (State Bar No. 126407)
Franklin D. Kang (State Bar No. 192314)
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
FARABOW, GARRETT
& DUNNER, L.L.P.
Scott R. Mosko (State Bar No. 106070)
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

LATHAM & WATKINS L.L.P.
Dean G. Dunlavey (State Bar No. 115530)
650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
Costa Mesa CA 92626-1925
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff MONOLITHIC
POWER SYSTEMS, INC. and
Counterclaim-Defendants ASUSTEK
COMPUTER INC. and ASUS
COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL

5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.,

14
15
16

Case No. C 08-4567 CW (EDL)

Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR AN ORDER PLACING
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

v.
O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

17

Defendant.

18
19

O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
Counterclaimant,

20
21
22
23
24
25

JUDGE:

Hon. Claudia Wilken

v.
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.,
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ASUSTEK
COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
AMERICA, BENQ CORPORATION, AND
BENQ AMERICA CORP.,
Counterclaim-Defendants.

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 08-4567 CW

1

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”), and

2

Counterclaim Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively

3

“ASUSTeK”) move for leave to file under seal the following pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5(b),

4

(c), and (d):

5

Exhibits 22 -23 to the Supplemental Declaration of Scott R. Mosko in Support of MPS and

6

ASUSTeK’s Response to O2 Micro International Ltd.’s Opposition to MPS and ASUSTeK’s Motion

7

for Attorneys’ Fees, Pursuant to the Court’s March 3, 2011, Order (Docket No. 449).

8
9

Counsel for MPS and ASUSTeK have established that their request is narrowly tailored to
information that MPS, ASUSTeK, Latham & Watkins L.L.P, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,

10

Garrett & Dunner L.L.P, and third-parties consider to be confidential, sensitive, non-public business

11

information.

12
13
14
15

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these documents be filed under seal in their
entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Pursuant to General Order 62, MPS and ASUSTeK shall
electronically file Exhibits 22 and 23 under seal within three days of the date of this Order.

16
17
18
19

June 22
Dated: _________________, 2011

___________________________________
Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 08-4567 CW