In Re David Bruntz

Filing 29

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR MONITION. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/8/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SF/1578779v1

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP Robert Berg State Bar No. 99319 email: [e-mail] Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415.781.7900 ph | 415.781.2635 fx ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER DAVID BRUNTZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION IN ADMIRALTY IN THE MATTER OF IN RE: DAVID BRUNTZ, as owner of a 2001 Twenty-foot Sanger/Sangair, HIN No. SANLX336G001, California Registration No. CF 2094 PT, in a cause of action for exoneration from or limitation of liability. Petitioner. CASE NO. C08-04613

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR MONITION

On October 3, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for Court approval of letter of undertaking and issuance of monition of injunction. On February 25, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting the same. Thereafter, the Petitioner requested that the Court issue a supplemental order on issues raised in the Motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that a notice issue out of and under the seal of this Court, citing all persons asserting claims with respect to which the complaint seeks exoneration or limitation and admonishing them to file their claim with the Clerk of this Court at the United States Courthouse, for the Northern District of California, 1301 Clay Street, Suite 400S, Oakland, CA 94612-5212, on or before May 11, 2009, and to serve upon or mail to the attorneys for Petitioner

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR MONITION

PAGE 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SF/1578779v1

a copy thereof on or before the same date, or be defaulted, with liberty to any person claiming damages as aforesaid who shall have presented his claim to the Clerk of this Court to answer said complaint and controvert any allegations made by Petitioner therein; and it is further ORDERED, that public notice of said notice be given, as provided by Rule F, Supplemental Rules of Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by publication of a notice, in The Contra Costa Times, a newspaper published in Contra Costa County, California, once in each week for four (4) successive weeks before the return date of said notice, and that plaintiff no later than the day of the second publication shall mail a copy of said notice to every person known to have any claim against the vessel or Petitioner or to his attorney, if known. ORDERED, that the service of this Order and the Court's Order of February 25, 2009 enjoining further prosecution of any actions or proceedings against the Petitioner or his property with respect to any claim subject to limitation in this action and requiring the filing of claims in this action be made in the usual manner by delivery of copies of the Orders to the person or persons to be enjoined or to their prospective attorney.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: 4/8/09 Saundra Brown Armstrong Judge, United States District Court

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR MONITION

PAGE 2