Schiff v. The City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 164

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT EXPERT DISCOVERY re (216 in 4:10-cv-01051-PJH) Stipulation filed by Frederick Schiff, (163 in 4:08-cv-04627-PJH) Stipulation filed by Frederick Schiff. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/10/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)

1 LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS K. BOURKE
2 Thomas K. Bourke (SBN 56333)

[e-mail]

3 601 West Fifth Street, Eighth Floor
4 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2094
5

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7 Attorney for Plaintiff Frederick Schiff.
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

FREDERICK SCHIFF,

14

Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN

17 FRANCISCO, et al.,

CASE NO. C08-4627 PJH (“Schiff 2”)
CASE NO. C10-01051 PJH (“Schiff 3”)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT EXPERT
DISCOVERY

Defendant.

18
19
20

WHEREAS the Court’s current deadline for the last day to make expert disclosures

21
22

is June 10, 2011; and
WHEREAS the Court’s current cut-off for expert discovery is August 12, 2011;

23
24
25
26
27
28

and
WHEREAS the parties currently have pending motions for summary judgment, or
partial summary judgment scheduled for hearing on June 29, 2011; and
WHEREAS the Court’s rulings on the parties’ pending motions for summary
judgment or partial summary judgment will likely affect the issues that will ultimately be
tried in the case; and
1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Conduct Expert Discovery

28
29

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

WHEREAS there is currently no trial date set in these two actions by the Court;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, subject to the approval of the
Court, that the deadline for conducting expert disclosures is extended to 30 days after the
Court issues a ruling on the parties’ pending motions for summary judgment, or partial
summary judgment, and
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, subject to the approval of
the Court, that the expert discovery cut-off is extended to 90 days from the date after the
Court issues a ruling on the parties’ pending motions for summary judgment, or partial
summary judgment.

10
11

Dated:

June 9, 2011

Law Office of Thomas K. Bourke

12
13

By: /s/ Thomas K. Bourke
Thomas K. Bourke
Attorney for Plaintiff Frederick (Ric) Schiff

14
15
16

Dated:

June 9, 2011

Office of the City Attorney

17
18

By: /s/ Lauren M. Monson
Lauren M. Monson
Attorney for Defendants City and County of
San Francisco, et al.

19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

FO

A

H

ER

Hamilton

LI

RT

27

hyllis J.

Judge P

R NIA

______________________________________
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO

26

6/10/11

UNIT
ED

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

24

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28

2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Conduct Expert Discovery

28
29

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

28
29

3
[Proposed] Order Granting Motion for Costs and Attorneys’ Fees Under FRCP 37(a)