Castor v. Conseco Senior Health Insurance Company et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING PRIVATE ADR re 15 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR filed by Jack Castor. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/22/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JACK CASTOR CASE NO. C08-4720PJH Plaintiffs), v. CONSECO SENIOR HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defcndant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process; Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENDS) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note; Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must insteadfile a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R 3-5) Private Process: / Private ADR (please identify process and provider) piivate mediation and JAMS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) / other requested deadline June 15,2009

Dated: ' / ^ / g f
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: fAV^f

X^

£

^

~

Attorney fbrDefendant AIG L i f e I n s u r a n c e Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JACK CASTOR CASE NO. C08-4720PJH Plaintiff(s), v. CONSECO SENIOR HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendant(s). STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

_J
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R, 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L,R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: / Private ADR (please identify process and provider) private mediation and JAMS

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) / other requested deadline June 15,2009

Dated: Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: 1 iS^i

Attornjey for ©efendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation / Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. x other June 15, 2009

UNIT ED

S

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/22/09

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE n milto is J. Ha ge Phyll Jud

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

NOTICE OF E-FILING I hereby certify that on this 12th day of January, 2009,1 electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk of the Court using the ECF System for filing and transmittal of a notice of electronic filing to the following parties.

IvutluJ
Mildred Schwam