Esquivel v. GMAC Mortgage
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/18/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 6/18/09 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to locate new counsel is granted. By July 16, 2009, Plaintiff must file either a v. GMAC MORTGAGE and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. / ROSA A. ESQUIVEL, Plaintiff, FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-4813 CW CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
notice of appearance by her new counsel, or a notice providing the Court with her current mailing address and phone number and stating that she intends to represent herself in this matter. If neither
document is filed by July 16, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rosa A. Esquivel 1160 Huron Lane Hayward, CA 94545 Dated: June 18, 2009 ESQUIVEL et al, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE et al, Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV08-04813 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 18, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?