Greenwood v. Compucredit Corporation et al

Filing 119

ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST for Order Extending Time for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motions for Protective Orders and Shortening Time for Defendants' Reply re 118 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/5/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAY SMITH (California Bar No. 166105) LAURIE A. TRAKTMAN (California Bar No. 165588) ADRIAN BARNES (California Bar No. 253131) STEPHANIE N, JOHNSON (pro hac vice) GILBERT & SACKMAN A LAW CORPORATION 3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (323) 938-3000 Fax: (323) 937-9139 STEVEN A. MARTINO (pro hac vice) W. LLOYD COPELAND (pro hac vice) KASIE M. BRASWELL (pro hac vice) TAYLOR-MARTINO-ZARZAUR, PC 51 St. Joseph Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 Telephone: (251) 433-3131 Fax: (251) 405-5080 GREGORY HAWLEY (pro hac vice) U. W. CLEMON (pro hac vice) CHRISTOPHER J. NICHOLSON (pro hac vice) WHITE, ARNOLD & DOWD, PC 2025 Third Avenue North, Suite 500 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Telephone: (205) 323-1888 Fax: (205) 323-8907 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WANDA GREENWOOD, LADELLE HATFIELD, and DEBORAH MCCLEESE on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION; COLUMBUS BANK AND TRUST, jointly and individually, Defendants. Case No. 4:08-cv-4878 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the terms set forth in the Stipulated Request for an Order Extending Time for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motions for Protective Orders and Shortening Time for Defendants' Reply submitted by Plaintiffs Wanda Greenwood, Ladelle Hatfield and Deborah McCleese and Defendants CompuCredit Corporation and Columbus Bank and Trust, and good cause appearing therefore, The briefing schedule for Defendants' Motions for Protective Orders shall be modified as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Opposition Brief: From October 6, 2009 to October 15, 2009 2. Defendants' Reply Briefs: From October 13, 2009 to October 20, 2009 3. The Hearing on Defendants' Motions for Protective Orders shall remain on October 27, 2009. Dated: UNIT ED ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI 1 FO lizabet Judge E h D. La port R NIA ERED O ORD ____________________ IT IS S The Honorable Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte e S IT IS SO ORDERED S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Stephanie N. Johnson, certify that on October 1, 2009, the foregoing STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY; DECLARATION OF STEPHANIE N. JOHNSON was filed electronically in the Court's ECF; thereby the ECF system automatically generated a "Notice of Electronic Filing" ("NEF") as service through CM/ECF to registered email addresses of parties of record in this case, in particular the following: Jay Edward Smith, Esq. js@gslaw.org Christopher Joseph Nicholson cnicholson@waadlaw.com Kasie M. Braswell, Esq. kasie@taylormartino.com Steven Anthony Martino, Esq. stevemartino@taylormartino.com Tim A. O'Brien, Esq. tobrien@mofo.com U.W. Clemon, Esq. uwclemon@waddlaw.com Susan L. Germaise sgermaise@mcguirewoods.com /s/ Stephanie N. Johnson Stephanie N. Johnson Adrian Barnes, Esq. abarnes@gslaw.org Greg Hascal Hawley ghawley@waadlaw.com Laurie Adrea Traktman, Esq. lat@gslaw.org William Lloyd Copeland, Esq. Lloyd@taylormartino.com James R. McGuire, Esq. jmcguire@mofo.com David L. Hartsell, Esq. dhartsell@mcquirewoods.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?