Sullins et al v. Exxon/Mobil Corporation

Filing 87

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion in Limine (cwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2010)

Download PDF
Sullins et al v. Exxon/Mobil Corporation Doc. 87 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 16, 2010 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. 5. 4. DENIED. Exclude reference to the Pitcock Settlement. GRANTED, in part. Unless Plaintiffs agree, Defendant may not Defendant may refer to the The Court rules on Plaintiffs' motions in limine four and five as follows: Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine Exclude reference to reimbursement from UST fund. v. EXXON/MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant. / CARLTON SULLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-04927 CW ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE FOUR AND FIVE (Docket # 86) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT refer to the amount of the settlement. fact that Plaintiffs sued Pitcock Petroleum for contamination resulting from the Pitcock Release. The parties shall draft an instruction explaining how the jury should consider this.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?