Sand Hill Advisors LLC v. Sand Hill Advisors LLC
ORDER re 85 MOTION for Reconsideration re 84 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLCREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLC MOTION for Reconsi deration re 84 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLCREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLC filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLC. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/23/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 SAND HILL ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 SAND HILL ADVISORS, LLC, a California 10 limited liability company, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 23, 2010 ____________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge This matter is scheduled for hearing on September 21, 2010, for Defendant Sand Hill Advisors LLC's Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge. To expedite matters, the Court revises the briefing schedule specified in Civil Local Rule 73 as follows: 1. Any opposition to the motion shall be filed by no than July 9, 2010. The failure to Defendant. Case No: C 08-5016 SBA ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
timely file an opposition may be construed as a consent to the granting of the motion. 2. 3. Any reply shall be filed by no later than July 16, 2010. The Court, in its discretion, may decide the motion without oral argument, pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b), in which case no appearance for the motion will be necessary. The parties are advised to check the Court's website to determine whether a court appearance is required. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?