Anderson v. Koch

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/3/08: This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis. CASE TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 pauperis; and 1 vs. RICHARD PERRY KOCH, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the San Francisco County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in San Francisco County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICKARD DENNIS ANDERSON, Petitioner, No. 2:08-cv-2371 JFM (HC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /mp/001 ande2371.108 2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. DATED: November 3, 2008. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?