Gilmer et al v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

Filing 196

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE for Defendant to Comply with Judge Laporte's 2/22/2011 Order re 195 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/15/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FOSTERemploymentlaw MICHAEL W. FOSTER (State Bar No. 127691) MICHAEL E. WILBUR (State Bar No. 152361) DAVID CARDIFF (State Bar No. 184246) TAMMY A. BROWN (State Bar No. 172612) FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 3000 LAKESHORE AVENUE OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94610 TELEPHONE: (510) 763-1900 FACSIMILE: (510) 763-5952 Attorneys for Defendant ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLY WITH 2-22-11 ORDER CASE NO. C08-05186 CW (EDL) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ) ) DISTRICT, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) BRIAN GILMER, ANTHONY RODGERS, DELORIS WILKINS, JERRY WILLIAMS, RAYMOND ROBBINS Case No. C08-05186CW (EDL) Date Action Filed: Nov. 17, 2008 Trial Date: Not set. STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAPORTE'S FEBRUARY 22, 2011 ORDER The parties stipulate and Defendant AC Transit District requests that the Court issue an Order extending the deadline by which Defendant Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District is to provide amended responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions Nos. 28 and 34. Plaintiffs do not oppose this request. On February 22, 2011, Magistrate Judge Laporte entered an order requiring Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions Nos. 28 and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FOSTERemploymentlaw 34 within 21 days of the order. Under the terms of the February 22, 2011 order, the deadline for Defendant to provide said responses is March 15, 2011. On March 3, 2011, Defendant filed a motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order. That motion is currently pending before Judge Wilken. In light of the pending motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order, the parties stipulate, and Defendant AC Transit District requests entry of an order providing, as follows: 1. Defendant shall be relieved from the 21-day deadline set out in the Magistrate Judge Laporte's February 22, 2011 order; 2. If the Court issues an order denying Defendant's pending motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order, or Defendant's motion for relief is deemed denied by operation of Local Rule 72-2 (if the Court neither issues a ruling on the motion or sets a briefing schedule on the motion within 14 days of the filing of the motion), Defendant shall have until 7 days after the motion for relief is denied or deemed denied to provide amended responses as required by the February 22, 2011 order. Plaintiffs do not oppose this request. There has been no prior modification to the deadline set forth in the February 22, 2011 order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 11, 2011 LEONARD CARDER, LLP 11 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Philip C. Monrad Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brian Gilmer, Anthony Rodgers, Deloris Wilkins, Jerry Williams, and Raymond Robbins Dated: March 11, 2011 FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLY WITH 2-22-11 ORDER /s/ Michael E. Wilbur Tammy A. Brown Attorneys for Defendant 2 CASE NO. C08-05186 CW (EDL) 1 2 3 4 Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District 15 IT IS SO ORDERED, this ___ day of March, 2011 6 7 8 9 10 FOSTERemploymentlaw UNIT ED 5 ER N 11 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 F D IS T IC T O R 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLY WITH 2-22-11 ORDER CASE NO. C08-05186 CW (EDL) A C LI FO D lizabeth Judge E . Laport e R NIA ___________ ______________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE DERED UnitedS SO ODistrict Judge States R TI S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O I NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?