Gilmer et al v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

Filing 63

ORDER re 58 granting Stipulation Allowing Defendant To File Second Amended Answer. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/21/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FOSTER Employment Law

MICHAEL W. FOSTER (State Bar No. 127691) DAVID J. CARDIFF (State Bar No. 184246) MADELYN G. JORDAN-DAVIS (State Bar No. 181771) FOSTER AND ASSOCIATES 3000 LAKESHORE AVENUE OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94610 TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant, ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BRIAN GILMER, ANTHONY RODGERS, DELORIS WILKINS, JERRY WILLIAMS, RAYMOND ROBBINS, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant.

CASE NO.: C08-05186 Date Action Filed: November 17, 2008 STIPULATION ALLOWING DEFENDANT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER

The parties to this Action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows: That Defendant may file as its Second Amended Answer the document attached hereto as Exhibit "A." IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: 06/30/09 __/s/ Margot A. Rosenberg_______________ Philip C. Monrad, Esq. Margot A. Rosenberg, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brian Gilmer, Anthony Rodgers, Deloris Wilkins, Jerry Williams, and Raymond Robbins

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FOSTER Employment Law

DATED: 06/30/09

___/s/ David J. Cardiff_____________________ Michael W. Foster, Esq. David J. Cardiff, Esq. Madelyn G. Jordan-Davis, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: 7/21/09 __________________________ CLAUDIA A. WILKEN United States District Judge

11
3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28