Sanborn et al v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS THE BOEING COMPANY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES WITH PREJUDICE AND REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT re 60 Stipulation, filed by Boeing Company, The. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/6/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2009)
ISTRIC ES D TC T TA
F D IS T IC T O R
hyllis Judge P
OO IT IS S
RT U O
PROOF OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Bryan Cave LLP, 120 3 Broadway, Suite 300, Santa Monica, California 90401. My email address is 4 firstname.lastname@example.org. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 On February 5, 2009, I efiled the foregoing document, described as JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS THE BOEING COMPANY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES, INC. WITH PREJUDICE AND REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT; [PROPOSED] ORDER, through the United Sates District Court Northern District of California Electronic Case File system; Per General Order No. 45; Section 9 - Service of Electronic Filed Documents: Upon the filing of a document by a party, an e-mail message will be automatically generated by the electronic filing system and sent to all parties in the case. Receipt of this message shall constitute service on the receiving party. Executed on February 5, 2009, at Santa Monica, California.
(FEDERAL ONLY) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of 13 the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. /s/ Diane Kinder Diane Kinder
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS BOEING, UTC, AND PWES AND REMAND TO STATE COURT; [PROPOSED ORDER]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?