Serger v. Napa State Hospital et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/21/08 ORDERING that this matter is TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Northern District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a county detainee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Although filed on a habeas corpus petition, petitioner alleges that he is being denied adequate medical care by officials at Napa State Hospital, where he is currently detained. Because petitioner is challenging conditions of confinement, the court construes this action as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL A. SERGER, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-2726 GGH P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). In this case, the defendants are located and the claim arose in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. DATED: November 21, 2008 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GGH:mp serg2726.108a

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?