Bates v. Sendme, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER CONTINUING RESPONSE DATE re 6 Stipulation filed by Sendme, Inc.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/5/2008. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-05361-MEJ

Document 6

Filed 12/05/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) [e-mail] TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096) [e-mail] LESLIE KRAMER (CSB No. 253313) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant SENDME, INC.

ALAN HIMMELFARB (CSB No. 90480) KAMBEREDELSON LLC 2757 Leonis Boulevard Vernon, CA 90058 Telephone: [phone] MYLES MCGUIRE KAMBEREDELSON LLC 53 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 550 Chicago, IL 60604 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintff TINA BATES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TINA BATES, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. SENDME, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

Case No. 08-5361 MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SENDME'S RESPONSE DATE TO THE CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2008, Plaintiff Tina Bates ("Bates") filed her Class Action Complaint ("Complaint") against Defendant SendMe, Inc. ("SendMe"); WHEREAS, on November 26, 2008, SendMe filed a Notice of Removal in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; WHEREAS, SendMe's response to the Complaint is currently due to be filed and served on or before December 5, 2008; WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have conferred and agree that SendMe's deadline to respond to the Complaint should be continued for 60 days. ACCORDINGLY, SendMe and Bates, by and through their counsel of record, hereby
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SENDME'S RESPONSE DATE TO THE CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CASE NO. 08-5361 MEJ

Case 3:08-cv-05361-MEJ

Document 6

Filed 12/05/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

stipulate that the deadline for SendMe to respond to the Complaint is continued until February 3, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 5, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By:

/s/ Rodger R. Cole Rodger R. Cole

Attorneys for Defendant SENDME, INC. Dated: December 5, 2008 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC

By:

/s/ Myles McGuire Myles McGuire

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SENDME'S RESPONSE DATE TO THE CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2

Attorneys for Plaintiff TINA BATES

CASE NO. 08-5361 MEJ

Case 3:08-cv-05361-MEJ

Document 6

Filed 12/05/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Rodger R. Cole, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 5th day of December, 2008, at Mountain View, California. FENWICK & WEST LLP

By:

/s/ Rodger R. Cole Rodger R. Cole

Attorneys for Defendant SEND ME, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SENDME'S RESPONSE DATE TO THE CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 3 CASE NO. 08-5361 MEJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December ___, 2008 By: The Honorable Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge