Seymour et al v. Godwin et al

Filing 60

ORDER vacating 57 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Settlement, and order re 59 Objection, filed by Jean A. Godwin, Larry W. Godwin, Karen Banks, Eugene Banks, Chris Rosales, Melanie Rosales. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/15/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010)

Download PDF
Seymour et al v. Godwin et al Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WILLIAM A. SEYMOUR, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. LARRY W. GODWIN, et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Before the court is the objection lodged by defendants to the court's re-referral of this matter to Magistrate judge Laporte for another settlement conference in lieu of proceeding with defendants' motion to enforce the settlement reached by the parties at the April 29, 2010 settlement conference. No response has been filed by plaintiffs. The court has reconsidered the referral in light of defendants' objections and hereby VACATES the referral for a further settlement conference. Instead the court will proceed to hear and decide defendants' motion to enforce which was filed on August 12, 2010. Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be filed no later than September 29, 2010. The reply, if any, shall be filed no later than October 6, 2010. The matter will be decided on the papers unless the court, after reviewing the papers, determines that a hearing is necessary. A copy of the transcript or tape recording of any and all proceedings reflecting the settlement that is reported in Judge Laporte's civil minutes of April 29, 2010, shall be provided by defendants immediately, if not included already in their moving papers. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge No. C 09-0169 PJH ORDER RE SETTLEMENT REFERRAL AND MOTION TO ENFORCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?