Haynes v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 43

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/21/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Download PDF
Haynes v. City and County of San Francisco et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ The court having been advised by minute order of August 13, 2010, entered following a settlement conference, that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, and the date for filing of pretrial papers having passed without any papers being filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of ninety (90) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The October 7, 2010 and November 1, 2010 dates for pretrial conference and trial respectively, are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge CHARLES HAYNES, Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-0174 PJH ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?