Valdez et al v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 210

ORDER re 207 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Francisco Valdez, Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, 205 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs, 209 Opposition/Response to Motio n, filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs, 206 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs, 208 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs, 204 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on September 27, 2013. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2013)

1
2
3

United States District Court
Northern District of California

4
5
6
7

FRANCISCO VALDEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.: CV 09-0176 KAW
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS'
UNUSABLE CHAMBERS COPY OF
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND/OR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

12
13
14
15

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the chambers copy of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants'

16

Second Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 209, and

17

accompanying exhibits, Dkt. Nos. 204, 205, 206, 207, and 208, were submitted in a format that is

18

not usable by the court.

19

The chambers copy is not usable because it

20

☒

consists of a stack of loose paper wrapped with a rubber band;

21

☐

consists of a stack of loose paper fastened with a binder clip or a paper clip;

22

☒

is too thick to permit secure fastening with a staple, and is fastened with a
brad-type fastener that is too short for the thickness of the document;

23
24

☒

has no tabs for the voluminous exhibits;

25

☒

includes exhibits that are illegible;

26

☐

includes exhibits that are unreadable because the print is too small;

27

☒

includes text and/or footnotes in a font smaller than 12 point;

28

1

☐

has requested leave to file those portions under seal; or

2
3

includes portions or exhibits that are redacted because the submitting party

☐

is not usable for another reason –

4
5

The paper used for the above-described chambers copy has been recycled by the court.

6

Plaintiffs shall submit a chambers copy in a format that is usable by the court no later than

7

October 1, 2013 at 5:00 p.m.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: September 27, 2013

10

KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2