Valdez et al v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
232
ORDER re 230 Notice (Other), filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on December 9, 2013. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
FRANCISCO VALDEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.: 4:09-cv-0176 KAW
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a request for clarification of the court's amended
14
order regarding the defendants' second motion for summary judgment. (Mot. for Clarification,
15
Dkt. No. 230.) The court construes Plaintiffs' filing as a motion for administrative relief pursuant
16
to Civil Local Rule 7-11. In accordance with that Civil Local Rule, the defendants may file a
17
response to Plaintiffs' motion within 4 days of the date of this order. The court will issue its order
18
on the request for clarification once that time period has elapsed, whether or not the defendants
19
elect to file a response.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 9, 2013
__________________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?