Valdez et al v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 232

ORDER re 230 Notice (Other), filed by Daniel Martinez, Ricardo Vasquez, Jamil Stubbs. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on December 9, 2013. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 FRANCISCO VALDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.: 4:09-cv-0176 KAW ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On December 5, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a request for clarification of the court's amended 14 order regarding the defendants' second motion for summary judgment. (Mot. for Clarification, 15 Dkt. No. 230.) The court construes Plaintiffs' filing as a motion for administrative relief pursuant 16 to Civil Local Rule 7-11. In accordance with that Civil Local Rule, the defendants may file a 17 response to Plaintiffs' motion within 4 days of the date of this order. The court will issue its order 18 on the request for clarification once that time period has elapsed, whether or not the defendants 19 elect to file a response. 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 9, 2013 __________________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?