Belks Media v. OnlineNic, Inc. et al
Filing
59
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
BELKS MEDIA, a Hong Kong business
Case No: C 09-00198 SBA
6 entity,
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
9 ONLINENIC, a California corporation; and
BELKS STORES SERVICES, INC., a North
10 Carolina corporation,
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
In accordance with the Court’s Order Accepting Report and Recommendation,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT final judgment shall be entered in favor of
Cross-Complainant Belk Store Services, Inc. (“Belk”) on its claims against China Internet
Ltd. (“CIL”), as follows:
1.
a.
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
$13,283.00 in attorneys’ fees; and
c.
20
$60,000.00 in actual damages;
b.
19
22
CIL shall pay Belk the following amounts:
$412.10 in costs.
CIL and each of its agents, servants, employees and all those persons in
concert or participation with CIL, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from
directly or indirectly: (i) registering, trafficking in, or using any domain name that is
identical or confusingly similar to the BELK marks; (ii) falsely representing or causing
confusion in any manner such that the public would tend to falsely associate CIL’s
business, services, or products as being the same as, or related to, approved by, sponsored
by, affiliated with, or otherwise having any relationship with Belk or its business, services,
1
and products; and (iii) assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity in
2
engaging in or performing any of the said activities.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2011
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?