Jaegel et al v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 45

ORDER re 44 Granting Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. ***Deadlines terminated. Case Management Conference set for 9/14/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/9/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)

Download PDF
Jaegel et al v. County of Alameda et al Doc. 45 1 GREGORY J. ROCKWELL, ESQ. (SBN 67305) grockwell@bjg.com 2 JILL P. SAZAMA, ESQ. (SBN 214215) jsazama@bjg.com 3 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE A Professional Corporation 4 555 12th Street, Suite 1800 P. O. Box 12925 5 Oakland, CA 94604-2925 Telephone: (510) 834-4350 6 Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 7 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY J. 8 AHERN and JASON LUNA 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-0242 CW Related Case No.: 09-03181 CW STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER Complaint Filed: January 20, 2009 MARK ANTHONY JAEGEL SR, MARK 12 ANTHONY JAEGEL JR., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 The undersigned hereby stipulate and jointly request the Court to order as follows: That this is a complex class action, which involves issues related to the search practices of 20 the Alameda County Sheriff's Office at its jail facilities over a period of years. 21 That counsel for the plaintiffs have recently received over 4000 pages of documents from 22 the defendant, and it is anticipated that the defendant will be producing a large volume of 23 additional documents in the near future. 24 That review of these documents must be completed before meaningful depositions of the 25 defendant's witnesses can be taken. 26 That the parties have agreed that initial depositions of the defendant's witnesses will be -1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER Jaegel, et al. vs. The County of Alameda, et al.; USDC Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-0242 CW Jaegel v. County of Alameda, et al.; USDC Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-03181 CW Dockets.Justia.com 27 taken on August 3, 4 and 5, 2010, and that it will likely take several months before plaintiffs' 28 1 counsel will be able to conclude all necessary depositions. 2 That the case management conference in both of the above actions set for July 13, 2010 3 may be continued to September 14, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., or such other date and time as the court my 4 order. 5 That the parties shall file a joint case management conference statement no later than 6 September 7, 2010. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: 7/9/2010 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER Jaegel, et al. vs. The County of Alameda, et al.; USDC Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-0242 CW Jaegel v. County of Alameda, et al.; USDC Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-03181 CW 25913\507904 DATED: July 6, 2010 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE A Professional Corporation By: /s/Gregory J. Rockwell____________ GREGORY J. ROCKWELL, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY J. AHERN and JASON LUNA DATED: July 7, 2010 JOHN R. COGORNO, Attorney At Law By: /s/ John R. Cogorno_____________ JOHN R. COGORNO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORDER Good Cause appearing therefore, the Case Management Conference set for July 13, 2010 in actions 09-0242CW and 09-03181CW is hereby continued to September 14, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement no later than September 7, 2010. ____________________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?