Villegas v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 156

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 155 Stipulation, filed by Nicole Villegas. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/3/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PETER M. HART, Esq. (State Bar No. 198691) LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART 12121 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 205 Los Angeles, California 90025 Tel.: (310) 207-0109 Fax.: (509) 561 - 6441 hartpeter@msn.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 KENNETH H. YOON (State Bar No. 198443) LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 612-0988 (213) 947-1211 facsimile kyoon@yoon-law.com LARRY W. LEE (State Bar. No. 228175) DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1370 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 488 – 6555 (213) 488 – 6554 facsimile lwlee@diversitylaw.com ERIC S. HONIG, Esq. (State Bar No. 140765) LAW OFFICES OF ERIC HONIG P.O. Box 10327 Marina Del Rey, California 90295 Telephone: (310) 314-2603 Facsimile: (509) 561-6441 erichonig@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Nicole Villegas UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: CV 09-00261 SBA NICOLE VILLEGAS, as an individual and on ) ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., a Delaware ) corporation; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, ) ) N.A., a national association; CHASE BANK ) USA, N.A., a national association; and DOES ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA) 1 1 through 50, inclusive, 2 Defendants. 3 4 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, it is hereby stipulated, by and between 5 NICOLE VILLEGAS (“Plaintiff”) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6 Chase Bank USA, N.A. (collectively, “Defendants”)1 (collectively the “Parties”), through their 7 respective undersigned counsel, as follows: WHEREAS, on June 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Joint Notice of Settlement and Stipulation 8 9 to Set Status Conference and to Vacate Dates with Proposed Order; WHEREAS, the Parties executed a memorandum of understanding containing settlement 10 11 terms for Plaintiff’s individual and class action claims; WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, the Parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement, and 12 13 requested a hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 14 (“Motion”) on November 8, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.; WHEREAS, on July 15, 2011, the Court set a hearing on the parties’ motion for 15 16 preliminary approval of settlement for November 15, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011, the Court ordered that any opening brief of no more 17 18 than fifteen (15) pages and/or any other relevant documents shall be filed by no later than 19 September 27, 2011; any opposing or responsive briefs of no more than fifteen (15) pages and/or 20 21 22 other relevant documents shall be filed by no later than October 11, 2011; and any reply brief of no more than ten (10) pages and/or other relevant documents filed by no later than October 25, 2011. WHEREAS, Plaintiff received additional data the week ending September 23, 2011, and 23 24 is thus still in the process of reviewing this data; WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize the long-form class action 25 26 27 28 Settlement Agreement; 1 Defendants reserve all defenses with respect to Plaintiff’s improper naming of “J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.” and “Chase Bank, USA, N.A.” as Defendants in this action. 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA) 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, as a result of the above, Plaintiff does not anticipate that she will be able to file the Opening Brief until October 18, 2011. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Opening Brief for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement will be filed on or before October 18, 2011, any responses will be filed by October 25, 2011, and any replies by November 1, 2011. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, 8 through their respective undersigned counsel, that the hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary 9 Approval of Class Action Settlement shall remain as scheduled for November 15, 2011. 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: September 26, 2011 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: ______/s/___________________________ Carrie A. Gonell Attorneys for Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Chase Bank USA, N.A. DATED: September 26, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 By: /s/ __ Peter M. Hart ___________________ Attorney for Plaintiff NICOLE VILLEGAS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER The Parties having so stipulated, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Opening Brief for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement will be filed on or before October 18, 2011, any responses will be filed by October 25, 2011, and any replies by November 1, 2011. 2. The hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall remain as scheduled for November 15, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 Date: 10/3/11 ___________________________ The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong Judge of the United States District Court 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?