Villegas v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
156
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 155 Stipulation, filed by Nicole Villegas. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/3/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2011)
1
2
3
4
PETER M. HART, Esq. (State Bar No. 198691)
LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART
12121 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 205
Los Angeles, California 90025
Tel.: (310) 207-0109
Fax.: (509) 561 - 6441
hartpeter@msn.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
KENNETH H. YOON (State Bar No. 198443)
LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON
One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 612-0988
(213) 947-1211 facsimile
kyoon@yoon-law.com
LARRY W. LEE (State Bar. No. 228175)
DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1370
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 488 – 6555
(213) 488 – 6554 facsimile
lwlee@diversitylaw.com
ERIC S. HONIG, Esq. (State Bar No. 140765)
LAW OFFICES OF ERIC HONIG
P.O. Box 10327
Marina Del Rey, California 90295
Telephone: (310) 314-2603
Facsimile: (509) 561-6441
erichonig@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Nicole Villegas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: CV 09-00261 SBA
NICOLE VILLEGAS, as an individual and on )
)
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., a Delaware )
corporation; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, )
)
N.A., a national association; CHASE BANK )
USA, N.A., a national association; and DOES )
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA)
1
1 through 50, inclusive,
2
Defendants.
3
4
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, it is hereby stipulated, by and between
5
NICOLE VILLEGAS (“Plaintiff”) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
6
Chase Bank USA, N.A. (collectively, “Defendants”)1 (collectively the “Parties”), through their
7
respective undersigned counsel, as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Joint Notice of Settlement and Stipulation
8
9
to Set Status Conference and to Vacate Dates with Proposed Order;
WHEREAS, the Parties executed a memorandum of understanding containing settlement
10
11
terms for Plaintiff’s individual and class action claims;
WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, the Parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement, and
12
13
requested a hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
14
(“Motion”) on November 8, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.;
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2011, the Court set a hearing on the parties’ motion for
15
16
preliminary approval of settlement for November 15, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011, the Court ordered that any opening brief of no more
17
18
than fifteen (15) pages and/or any other relevant documents shall be filed by no later than
19
September 27, 2011; any opposing or responsive briefs of no more than fifteen (15) pages and/or
20
21
22
other relevant documents shall be filed by no later than October 11, 2011; and any reply brief of
no more than ten (10) pages and/or other relevant documents filed by no later than October 25,
2011.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff received additional data the week ending September 23, 2011, and
23
24
is thus still in the process of reviewing this data;
WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize the long-form class action
25
26
27
28
Settlement Agreement;
1
Defendants reserve all defenses with respect to Plaintiff’s improper naming of “J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.” and
“Chase Bank, USA, N.A.” as Defendants in this action.
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, as a result of the above, Plaintiff does not anticipate that she will be able to
file the Opening Brief until October 18, 2011.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Opening Brief for Preliminary Approval of
Class Action Settlement will be filed on or before October 18, 2011, any responses will be filed
by October 25, 2011, and any replies by November 1, 2011.
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
8
through their respective undersigned counsel, that the hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary
9
Approval of Class Action Settlement shall remain as scheduled for November 15, 2011.
10
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 26, 2011
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By: ______/s/___________________________
Carrie A. Gonell
Attorneys for Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Chase Bank
USA, N.A.
DATED: September 26, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
By:
/s/
__
Peter M. Hart
___________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
NICOLE VILLEGAS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Opening Brief for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement will be filed
on or before October 18, 2011, any responses will be filed by October 25, 2011, and
any replies by November 1, 2011.
2. The hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall
remain as scheduled for November 15, 2011 at 1:00 p.m.
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
14
Date: 10/3/11
___________________________
The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
Judge of the United States District Court
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEULE RE MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. CV 09-00261 SBA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?