Schaffner v. Crown Equipment Corporation
Filing
224
STIPULATION AND ORDER Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Jury Selection set for 7/16/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Jury Trial set for 7/16/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/14/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN: 71450)
DANIEL J. SCULLY, JR. (SBN: 94661)
kkeller@kksrr.com
dscully@clarkhill.com
MICHAEL D. LISI (SBN 196974)
CLARK HILL P.C.
500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2500
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Telephone: (313) 965-8468
Facsimile: (313) 965-8252
mlisi@kksrr.com
GARTH A. ROSENGREN (SBN 215732)
grosengren@kksrr.com
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
th
5 555 Montgomery Street, 17 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
6 Telephone: (415) 249-8330
Facsimile: (415) 249-8333
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant CROWN EQUIPMENT CORP.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
(OAKLAND DIVISION)
12
FRANK SCHAFFNER,
Case No.: C09-00284 SBA
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION dba
CROWN LIFT TRUCKS, NORTHWEST
HANDLING SYSTEM, INC.,
18
19
20
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE TRIAL DATE
v.
Defendants.
NORTHWEST HANDLING SYSTEMS,
INC.,
Cross-Claimant,
21
22
v.
23
CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION dba
CROWN LIFT TRUCKS, and DOES I-X,
inclusive, and EACH OF THEM,
24
25
26
27
Cross-Defendants.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.,
Lien Claimant.
28
1
_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: C09-00284 SBA
1
WHEREAS on February 10, 2012, the Court entered an order vacating the dates for
2
the pretrial conference and trial in this matter, and set a Case Management Conference for
3
February 29, 2012 for the purpose of re-scheduling those dates;
4
WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff Frank Schaffner (“Plaintiff”), Defendant Crown
5
Equipment Corporation (“Crown”), and Defendant and Cross-Complainant North West
6
Handling Systems, Inc. (“NWHS”) appeared telephonically for the Case Management
7
Conference on February 29th;
8
9
10
WHEREAS at the Case Management Conference, the Court tentatively set a trial date
of June 25, 2012, and the parties raised various concerns regarding scheduling conflicts for
counsel and potential witnesses;
11
WHEREAS, in response to those concerns, the Court ordered the parties to meet and
12
confer about a possible alternative date, and if possible, to prepare and file a stipulation and
13
proposed order to re-set the trial and pretrial conference to another date, provided the trial
14
would be concluded by no later than the end of July 2012;
15
WHEREAS, the parties have now met and conferred regarding the respective
16
schedules of counsel and witnesses, and have determined that starting the trial in this matter
17
on July 16, 2012, would allow the parties to resolve all of their scheduling issues, save for
18
Plaintiff’s concern regarding the availability of his expert witness, Dr. Ziernicki; and
19
WHEREAS, in order to accommodate Dr. Ziernicki’s schedule, the parties have
20
further agreed that Dr. Ziernicki may, if necessary, be allowed to testify on July 20, 2012,
21
even if such testimony would occur during a portion of the trial ordinarily reserved for
22
Defendant’s witnesses, unless Dr. Ziernicki’s schedule opens so that he may testify earlier.
23
24
25
26
THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for Plaintiff,
Crown, and NWHS, and subject to approval by the Court:
(a) the trial in this matter shall be re-set for July 16, 2012 at 8:30 AM, and the pretrial
conference shall be re-set for June 26, 2012 at 1:00 PM;
27
(b) subject to the Court’s ruling on Crown’s motion in limine to exclude portions of
28
Dr. Ziernicki’s testimony, and without waiving any of defendants’ objections to
2
_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: C09-00284 SBA
1
such testimony, Dr. Ziernicki will be permitted to testify not later than July 20,
2
2012, even if such testimony would occur during that portion of the trial reserved
3
for defendants’ witnesses; and
4
(c) if Dr. Ziernicki’s schedule changes and he is available earlier than July 20, 2012,
5
then Dr. Ziernicki’s testimony (if any) will be presented during Plaintiff’s case-in-
6
chief.
7
8
Dated: March 14, 2012
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
9
By: _______________/s/______________________
Michael D. Lisi
Attorneys for Defendant CROWN EQUIPMENT
CORP.
10
11
12
13
Dated: March 14, 2012
WELTIN STREB WELTIN LLP
14
15
By: _______________/s/______________________
Daniel R. Weltin
Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK SCHAFFNER
16
17
18
19
Dated: March 14, 2012
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: _______________/s/______________________
Nora M. Nachtsheim
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant for
NORTH WEST HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC.
I hereby attest that I have been authorized by the above counsel to execute on their behalf
this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Trial Date.
Executed on this 13th day of March, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
_________/s/_________________________
Michael D. Lisi
3
_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: C09-00284 SBA
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
A seven (7) day jury trial in this matter shall be re-set for July 16, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
3
and the pretrial conference shall be re-set for July 10, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.
4
5
6
7
Dated: March 14, 2012
____________________________________________
HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: C09-00284 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?