Schaffner v. Crown Equipment Corporation

Filing 229

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG finding as moot 197 Motion in Limine; granting 228 Motion (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

OAKLAND DIVISION

4
5 FRANK SCHAFFNER,

Plaintiff,

6
7

vs.

8 CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION dba
CROWN LIFT TRUCKS; NORTH WEST
9 HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Case No: C 09-00284 SBA
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION
Docket 228

Defendants.

10
11
12

Having read and considered Defendant Crown Equipment Corporation’s unopposed

13

Miscellaneous Administrative Request for Leave to Amend Motions in Limine and for

14

Additional Pages, and finding good cause therefrom,

15

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

16

1.

Defendant’s Administrative Request is GRANTED.

17

2.

Defendant may file an amended motion in limine in order to (a) clarify the

18

documents and information it seeks concerning the settlement between Plaintiff and Northwest

19

Handling Systems, and (b) seek the exclusion of testimony from Jose Garcia. Defendant’s

20

amended motion in limine shall be filed by Noon on June 29, 2012; Plaintiff’s amended

21

opposition shall be filed by close of business on July 2, 2012; and Defendant’s amended reply

22

shall be filed by July 3, 2012. The moving and opposition papers are limited to twelve (12)

23

pages and the reply is limited to six (6) pages. The parties shall certify that they met and

24

conferred in good faith on all disputed issues before filing their respective briefs. This order

25

terminates Docket 197 and 228.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2012

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge