LeGrand v. Yates

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 CORBETT LE GRAND, Petitioner, 8 9 vs. 10 JAMES A. YATES, Warden, 11 Case No: C 09-00370 SBA ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT Dkt. 16 Respondent. 12 13 14 Petitioner seeks an extension of time to file his Notice of Appeal from the judgment 15 entered by this Court in connection with its order denying his petition for a writ of habeas 16 corpus. Petitioner’s counsel claims that he had thirty days from the date the judgment, filed 17 March 30, 2012, to file his appeal, but that he mis-calendared the deadline. However, the 18 thirty-day deadline to appeal begins to run from date the judgment is entered. Fed. R.App. 19 P. 4(a)(1)(A). Although the judgment was dated March 30, 2012, it was not entered until 20 April 13, 2012. Therefore, Petitioner’s notice of appeal filed on May 8, 2012 is timely 21 without an extension. Dkt. 20. Accordingly, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file appeal is DENIED as moot. This Order terminates Docket 16. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2012 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?