Hamilton v. Thomson et al

Filing 111

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING DEFENDANTS 110 MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
[e-mail]
LYNNE G. STOCKER (SBN 130333)
[e-mail]
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants
N. GRANNIS and E. TOOTELL, M.D.

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

9

OAKLAND DIVISION

12

BERNARD LEE HAMILTON,

13
14
15

Case No.: 4:09-cv-00648-CW (PR)

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER
DISPOSITIVE MOTION

v.
G. THOMSON, et al.,

16

Defendants.
Hon. Claudia Wilken

17
18
19
20

Good cause appearing, the motion of Defendants of N. Grannis and E. Tootell for an

21

extension of the deadline to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion is

22

GRANTED.

23

Defendants N. Grannis and E. Tootell shall file and serve a motion for summary judgment or

24

other dispositive motion no later than thirty (30) days from the date that this Order is filed. At the

25

time of filing the motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, Defendants shall

26

comply with the Ninth Circuit’s decisions in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012) and

27

Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2012) and provide Plaintiff with notice of what is required

28

of him to oppose a summary judgment motion or motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust
1
{00092047.DOC/}DOC 0834

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

Hamilton v. Thomson, et al.
4:09-cv-00648-CW

1
2

administrative remedies.
Plaintiff’s opposition thereto shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later

3

than twenty-eight (28) days of the date the summary judgment or other dispositive motion is filed.

4

Before filing his opposition, Plaintiff is advised to read the notice that will be provided to him by

5

Defendants when the motion is filed, and Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

6

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), as well as the notice provided in this Court’s Order

7

Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 211).

8

Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date that

9

Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

11

7/22/2013
Dated: _____________________

________________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
{00092047.DOC/}DOC 0834

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

Hamilton v. Thomson, et al.
4:09-cv-00648-CW