Hamilton v. Thomson et al
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE CURRENT ADDRESS NECESSARY TO LOCATE DEFENDANT C. DOLE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/12/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. G. THOMSON, et al., Defendants. / BERNARD HAMILTON, Plaintiff, No. C 09-00648 CW (PR) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE CURRENT ADDRESS NECESSARY TO LOCATE DEFENDANT C. DOLE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Service. Service has been ineffective on Defendant C. Dole because he is no longer employed by San Quentin State Prison (SQSP). The The Court issued an Order of
Court has been informed that the SQSP litigation coordinator has been "unable to locate any information" regarding Defendant Dole's last known address. Plaintiff is responsible for providing the Court with current addresses for all Defendants so that service can be accomplished. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994); Sellers v. United States, 902 F.2d 598, 603 (7th Cir. 1990). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), if a complaint is not served within 120 days from the filing of the complaint, it may be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. When advised
of a problem accomplishing service, a pro se litigant must "attempt to remedy any apparent defects of which [he] has knowledge." Rochon v. Dawson, 828 F.2d 1107, 1110 (5th Cir. 1987). If the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
marshal is unable to effectuate service through no fault of his own, e.g., because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient information or because the defendant is not where the plaintiff claims, and the plaintiff is informed, the plaintiff must seek to remedy the situation or face dismissal. See Walker, 14 F.3d at
1421-22 (prisoner failed to show cause why claims against prison official should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m) because prisoner did not prove that he provided marshal with sufficient information to serve official or that he requested that official be served); see also Del Raine v. Williford, 32 F.3d 1024, 1029-31 (7th Cir. 1994) (prisoner failed to show good cause for failing to effect timely service on defendant because plaintiff did not provide marshal with copy of amended complaint until after more than 120 days after it was filed). Service on Defendant Dole has been attempted and has failed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must provide the Court with a current address, necessary to locate Defendant Dole. Failure to do so
shall result in the dismissal of all claims against Defendant Dole. If Plaintiff provides the Court with a current address, service shall again be attempted. If service fails a second time, all
claims against Defendant Dole shall be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/12/2010 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BERNARD HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. G. THOMSON et al, Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV09-00648 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 12, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Bernard Hamilton C-27300 San Quentin State Prison San Quentin, CA 94964 Dated: May 12, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?