Roe et al v. Doe et al

Filing 52

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/25/2009. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Before the court is a "stipulation of the parties in which plaintiffs dismiss all of their claims against defendants and in which defendants voluntarily withdraw with prejudice their claim for attorneys' fees and costs." The court is at a loss as to what is intended by this filing given that there are no longer any claims to voluntarily dismiss, the court having already dismissed all claims with prejudice and having furthermore entered a judgment in this case. The parties may either seek relief through a jointly prepared brief supported by legal authority, or may call the courtroom deputy of the undersigned to arrange an appearance for a status conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 25, 2009 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge RICHARD ROE, et al., Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-0682 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28