Paige v. New Haven Unified School District et al

Filing 90

ORDER by Judge Hamilton Re 85 Administrative Motion to Continue Summary Judgment Hearing Date (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2010)

Download PDF
Paige v. New Haven Unified School District et al Doc. 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. NEW HAVEN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ The court is in receipt of plaintiff's administrative motion to continue the hearing date for the pending summary judgment motions filed by defendants, as well as defendants' oppositions thereto. Plaintiff asserts that a continuance must be granted in view of the "extensive work" involved in preparing two oppositions to motions for summary judgment, and the fact that plaintiff's counsels' offices are leanly staffed, with no assistance provided by paralegals or associates. As a general matter, plaintiff has failed to establish good cause for her request. Any contrary finding would essentially allow routine workload and workforce concerns to always be grounds for a summary continuance. Nonetheless, and in view of the fact that plaintiff must oppose two separate motions, the court is somewhat sympathetic to plaintiff's plea. Accordingly, the court will GRANT plaintiff a two week extension of time in which to serve her opposition briefs to the motions. Plaintiff's opposition briefs shall now be due no later than October 20, 2010. Defendants' reply briefs shall be due no later than October 27, 2010. The hearing on defendants' motions is continued to November 10, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 30, 2010 ANGELIQUE PAIGE, Plaintiff, No. C 09-0687 PJH ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?