J.C. et al v. UAL Corporation et al

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL as to Defendants United Air Lines, Inc., and UAL Corporation with Prejudice. United Air Lines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., UAL Corporation and UAL Corporation terminated.. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 7/29/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2010) Modified on 7/29/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
J.C. et al v. UAL Corporation et al Doc. 98 1 Richard G. Grotch, Esq. - SBN 127713 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH 2 A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 3 Redwood City, California 94065-2133 Tel. (650) 592-5400 4 Fax. (650) 592-5027 E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com 5 ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants/Cross-Claimants 6 UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and UAL CORPORATION 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 09-0747 SBA (JL) (MEJ) STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND UAL CORPORATION Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge J.C., an individual, and as Guardian Ad 11 Litem for her child, S.C., a minor, 12 13 vs. 14 UAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; UNITED AIR LINES. INC.. a 15 subsidiary of UAL CORPORATION and a Delaware corporation; JACKSON 16 SENYONGA, an individual; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 / Plaintiff, 19 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM ____________________________________/ 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between plaintiffs J.C., AN INDIVIDUAL, AND 21 AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR HER CHILD, S.C., A MINOR, and defendants UAL 22 CORPORATION and UNITED AIR LINES, INC. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "United"), 23 through their respective attorneys of record, that plaintiffs claims, and each of them, against United, 24 be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil 25 Procedure. 26 /// 27 /// 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal C 09-0747 SBA (JL) (MEJ) Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the claims against defendant and cross-defendant, 2 JACKSON SENYONGA, by plaintiffs and cross-complainants United, shall not be dismissed by 3 this stipulation and order. 4 SO STIPULATED. THE DOLAN LAW FIRM B y: /s/ . 5 Dated: July 22, 2010 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: July 29, 2010 26 27 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH Michael J. DePaul Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: July 27, 2010 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH B y: /s/ . Richard G. Grotch Attorneys for Defendants/CrossComplainants United Air Lines, Inc. and UAL Corp. Dated: July 27, 2010 ALLEN MATKINS /s/ By: . Michael J. Betz A t t o r n e y s for Defendant/CrossDefendant Jackson Senyonga ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal C 09-0747 SBA (JL) (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?