PartsRiver, Inc. v. Shopzilla, Inc. et al

Filing 204

ORDER granting re 196 Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule And Continuing The Case Management Conference, filed by PartsRiver, Inc., Yahoo!, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Shopzilla, Inc., eBay, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/16/2009 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/29/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [JOINT FILING -- SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR COUNSEL] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 vs. 21 PartsRiver, Inc., 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION Defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment to be heard on July 16, 2009. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate to continuing the Initial Case Management Conference from June 16, 2009 until July 16, 2009 to coincide with the summary -1JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW Counterclaim-Defendant. Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Defendants. Shopzilla, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and Microsoft Corporation, vs. Shopzilla, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; eBay Inc.; and Microsoft Corporation, PartsRiver, Inc., Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:09-cv-00811-CW (filed Feb. 25, 2009) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JULY 16, 2009 [Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 judgment hearing, and the parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule for the summary judgment motion: Description Last day for Defendants to file motion for summary judgment Last day for Plaintiff to file brief in opposition to summary judgment Last day for Defendants to file reply brief in support of summary judgment Initial Case Management Conference and Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment Date Thursday May 28, 2009 Thursday June 18, 2009 Thursday July 2, 2009 2:00 p.m., Thursday July 16, 2009 The requested enlargement of the summary judgment briefing schedule accommodates the schedules of counsel for both parties and equitably distributes the additional time for briefing. Consolidation of the Initial Case Management Conference and summary judgment hearing is also more efficient for both the Court and the parties. The parties do not propose continuing the meet and confer or disclosure deadlines under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), Civil L.R. 16-9, and ADR L.R. 3-5. The only previous time modification in this case was the change in the date for the Case Management Conference (and corresponding deadlines under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), Civil L.R. 16-9, and ADR L.R. 3-5) as set forth in the Court's Case Management Scheduling Order for Reassigned Civil Case (Mar. 23, 2009) [Docket No. 167]. The requested changes to the case schedule will otherwise have no effect on the anticipated schedule for this case. -2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: May 22, 2009 By: /s/ Jack Baldwin Jack Baldwin (pro hac vice) <jbb@baldwinlaw.com> BALDWIN & BALDWIN, L.L.P. 400 West Houston Street P.O. Drawer 1349 Marshall, Texas 75671 Telephone: (903) 935-4131 Facsimile: (903) 935-9538 James McManis (Bar No. 40958) <jmcmanis@mcmanisfaulkner.com> Matthew Schechter (Bar No. 212003) <mschechter@mcmanisfaulkner.com> MCMANIS FAULKNER 50 West San Fernando Street, 10th Floor San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 279-8700 Facsimile: (408) 279-3244 Counsel for Plaintiff PartsRiver, Inc. -3JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW David E. Killough (Bar No. 110719) <davkill@microsoft.com> MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way, 8/2076 Redmond, Washington 98052 Telephone: (425) 703-8865 Facsimile: (425) 869-1327 Counsel for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff Microsoft Corporation Dated: May 22, 2009 By: /s/ Richard A. Cederoth David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice) <dpritikin@sidley.com> Richard A. Cederoth (pro hac vice) <rcederoth@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 Theodore W. Chandler (Bar No. 219456) <tchandler@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Marc R. Ascolese (Bar No. 251397) <mascolese@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 <SF-PartsRiver-MS-eBay@sidley.com> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW Dated: May 22, 2009 By: /s/ Richard A. Cederoth David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice) <dpritikin@sidley.com> Richard A. Cederoth (pro hac vice) <rcederoth@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 Theodore W. Chandler (Bar No. 219456) <tchandler@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Marc R. Ascolese (Bar No. 251397) <mascolese@sidley.com> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 <SF-PartsRiver-MS-eBay@sidley.com> Counsel for Defendant eBay Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW Dated: May 22, 2009 By: /s/ Dan D. Davison Dan D. Davison (pro hac vice) <ddavison@fulbright.com> FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 855-8000 Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 Richard S. Zembek (pro hac vice) <rzembek@fulbright.com> Daniel S. Leventhal (pro hac vice) <dleventhal@fulbright.com> FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77010 Telephone: (713) 651-5151 Facsimile: (713) 651-5246 John A. O'Malley, (Bar No. 101181) <jomalley@fulbright.com> FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 555 S. Flower Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-9200 Facsimile: (213) 892-9494 <Yahoo@fulbright.com> Counsel for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff Yahoo! Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -7JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW Dated: May 22, 2009 By: /s/ Jordan Trent Jones Jordan Trent Jones (Bar No. 166600) <jtjones@townsend.com> Heidi J. Kim (Bar No. 247699) <hjkim@townsend.com> TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 379 Lytton Ave Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 326-2400 Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 <Shopzilla@townsend.com> Counsel for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff Shopzilla, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories shown above. /s/ Marc R. Ascolese -8JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JULY 16, 2009 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. July 16, 2009. 2. The summary judgment briefing schedule set forth in the parties' JOINT The Initial Case Management Conference is continued until 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JULY 16, 2009 is hereby adopted. Dated: May 29, 2009 UNIT ED CLAUDIA WILKEN D United States District Judge RDERE S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R -9JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER -- No. 09-811-CW A C LI FO laud Judge C ia Wilk en R NIA IT IS S OO NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?