PartsRiver, Inc. v. Shopzilla, Inc. et al

Filing 254

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff PartsRiver Inc.'s Motion to Vacate the Court's Judgment. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/16/2010. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)

Download PDF
PartsRiver, Inc. v. Shopzilla, Inc. et al Doc. 254 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PARTSRIVER, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 09-0811 CW ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF PARTSRIVER, INC.'S MOTION TO VACATE THE COURT'S JUDGMENT / SHOPZILLA, INC.; YAHOO! INC.; EBAY INC.; AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendants. SHOPZILLA, INC.; YAHOO! INC.; EBAY INC.; AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, PARTSRIVER, INC., Counterclaim-Defendant. / In its Order of November 3, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded to this Court the matter of whether judgment in this action should be vacated. On December 10, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its mandate with respect to the November 3 Order. Accordingly, within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff PartsRiver, Inc., shall file its motion to vacate the Court's judgment. Defendants Shopzilla, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; eBay Inc. and Microsoft Corporation shall file their opposition in a consolidated brief fourteen days after Plaintiff's motion is filed. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Any reply shall be due seven days after Defendants file their opposition. The motion will be taken under submission on the papers, unless the Court schedules a hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2010 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?