Lucious

Filing 4

ORDER EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/4/09. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In re EMANUEL LUCIOUS, Plaintiff. / No. C 09-0819 PJH (PR) ORDER EXTENDING TIME UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA On February 25, 2009, the court received a letter from plaintiff complaining that he has been "conspicuously[] subjected to `contumely' in a sinister fashion . . . ." In an effort to protect his rights it was treated as an attempt to file a civil rights case. He was notified that he had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope. Plaintiff was informed that if he did not either pay the fee or file the application within thirty days the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has neither paid the fee nor applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He has written a letter to the court in which he acknowledges that the received the IFP application form, but instead of filling it out and returning it he has provided various statements of his prisoner account and asks that they be accepted as proof of his indigence. This is unsatisfactory. Plaintiff will be afforded one more chance to either pay the fee or file an IFP application; if it is not filed within thirty days of the date of this order, the case will be dismissed without further ado. The clerk shall close this file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2009. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.09\LUCIOUS0819.DSM-ifp.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?