Macias v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/13/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Netflix, Inc. THOMAS M. FERLAUTO, State Bar No. 155503 KING & FERLAUTO, LLP 1880 Century Park East, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OSCAR MACIAS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NETFLIX, INC. and WALMART.COM USA LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. CV 09 0961 (JCS) STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, Defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Oscar Macias, ("Plaintiff"), hereby stipulate: WHEREAS, on or about February 2, 2009, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, which alleges violations under California's Cartwright Act, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 16720, 16727; WHEREAS, on March 5, 2009, Defendant Walmart.com USA LLC filed a Notice of Removal of Action to this Court;
STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff styled the action as a putative class action; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed that Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to this complaint will be extended to 30 days after such time as either: (1) the Court decides whether this action was properly removed to this Court; or (2) this action is consolidated with other cases that originated in California Superior Court, should Plaintiff decline to seek remand. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that any extension agreed upon herein is without prejudice to Defendant's right to seek additional enlargements of time as necessary; WHEREAS, this stipulation shall not be taken as a waiver of any defenses that Defendant may have to Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise; NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate that Defendant shall have from 30 days after such time as either: (1) the Court decides whether this action was properly removed to this Court; or (2) this action is consolidated with other cases that originated in California Superior Court, should Plaintiff decline to seek remand, or other extension as contemplated above, to answer or otherwise respond. Dated: March 12, 2009 Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. By: /s/ Jonathan M. Jacobson Jonathan M. Jacobson Sara Ciarelli Walsh 1301 Avenue of the Americas 40th Floor New York, NY 10019 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Keith E. Eggleton 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Netflix, Inc.
STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Stipulated and agreed this 12th day of March, 2009 By: /s/ Thomas M. Ferlauto (with permission) Thomas M. Ferlauto King & Ferlauto, LLP 1880 Century Park East, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated

UNIT ED

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 13, 2009

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND

3

A

C

LI

FO

sep Judge Jo

h C. Sp

ero

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H