Dutra v. San Francisco Police Department et al
Filing
17
ORDER REMANDING CASE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/2/2009. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LORI A. DUTRA, Plaintiff, v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Defendant having failed to establish that removal was proper based on federal question jurisdiction, the court finds that this action must be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. The court notes, however, that plaintiff will be bound by her representation that the third cause of action for conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of civil rights is based on an underlying state law violation. Because the remand is for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the court finds it unnecessary to address plaintiff's motion to remand and motion for attorney's fees. No. C 09-1113 PJH ORDER REMANDING CASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 2, 2009 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
