McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al

Filing 196

ORDER MAINTAINING STAY AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference Statement due 11/29/2011. Case Management Conference set for 12/6/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 STEVEN MCARDLE, an individual, on behalf of himself, the general public and those similarly situated, 6 Plaintiff, 7 No. C 09-01117 CW ORDER MAINTAINING STAY AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 8 9 AT&T MOBILITY LLC; NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC; and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 / KENNETH A. THELIAN, an individual, on behalf of himself, the general public, and those similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 18 No. C 10-03440 CW Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC; NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC; and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., Defendants. 19 / 20 The parties have filed their joint brief regarding the effect 21 of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), on 22 these related cases. Having considered the parties’ brief, the 23 Court maintains the stay in these actions pending the Ninth 24 Circuit’s decision on Defendants’ appeal in McArdle v. AT&T 25 Mobility LLC. Within fourteen days of the date the Ninth Circuit 26 renders its decision in that appeal, the parties shall file a joint 27 brief on how this Court should proceed in these cases. 28 1 2 3 The case management conferences for these related cases set for August 9, 2011 are continued to December 6, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: 7/29/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?