McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al

Filing 248

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 246 Motion for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128)
[e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
MAYER BROWN LLP
KEVIN RANLETT (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
1999 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
AT&T Mobility LLC; New Cingular Wireless
PCS LLC, New Cingular Wireless Services,
Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT

14

OAKLAND DIVISION

15
16
17

STEVEN MCARDLE, an individual, on behalf
of himself, the general public and those
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

v.
AT&T MOBILITY LLC; NEW CINGULAR
WIRELESS PCS LLC, NEW CINGULAR
WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 150,

Case No. CV-09-01117 CW (MEJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF
RECENT DECISION IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOE LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; CASE NO. CV-09-01117 CW(MEJ)

1

Before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed administrative motion for leave to file a

2

statement of recent decision in support of the Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No.

3

222), and the supporting declaration of Kevin Ranlett. The Court hereby grants defendants leave

4

to file the requested Statement of Recent Decision, which in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7-

5

3(d) shall not contain any argument.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated:

9
10

7/8/2013

Hon. Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOE LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; CASE NO. CV-09-01117 CW(MEJ)