McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
Filing
372
Discovery Order re: 367 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, Steven McArdle, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 9/26/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
STEVEN MCARDLE,
9
Plaintiff,
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 09-cv-01117-CW (TSH)
DISCOVERY ORDER
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 367
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
The Court held a telephonic hearing this morning concerning the parties’ joint discovery
15
letter brief at ECF No. 367. Judge Wilken’s minute order provides that fact discovery closes four
16
months after the rulings from the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 358. The Court explained that this
17
means four months after the mandate issues from the Ninth Circuit. At the hearing, AT&T stated
18
it would answer interrogatories 10-13 within 30 days. In the letter brief, AT&T stated it would
19
produce documents in response to the requests for production (“RFPs”) other than 69-71 and 81.
20
The discussion at the hearing therefore focused mostly on these RFPs. For the reasons discussed
21
on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:
22
1.
AT&T shall produce anonymized records showing all California customers who
23
were charged for one-minute incoming or outgoing international roaming calls during the class
24
period, the date of each call, and the amount charged for each call, except for customers who
25
received refunds or credits that offset these charges. AT&T shall start this production within 30
26
days and finish it within 75 days. If the mandate issues soon, the Court may need to revisit the
27
timing of this production.
28
2.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel as to RFP 81 is DENIED because it exceeds the scope
1
of discovery that Judge Wilken authorized while the Ninth Circuit rulings are pending (see ECF
2
No. 358).
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 26, 2019
6
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?