Bender v. Intersil Corporation

Filing 44

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 29 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. INTERSIL CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s). GREGORY BENDER, Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C09-1155 CW (BZ) SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER

Following a telephone conference with both parties on October 29, 2009, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's motion to compel is GRANTED to the extent

that plaintiff is ORDERED to serve amended preliminary infringement contentions by November 10, 2009. If defendant

believes the amended contentions are inadequate, the parties shall meet and confer pursuant to the initial discovery order by November 17, 2009. 2. Defendant's motion for temporary relief from If defendant finds

discovery obligations is GRANTED IN PART.

the amended contentions adequate, its obligation to provide invalidity contentions under the Patent Local Rules is 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

triggered as of the date the amended contentions are served. If defendant finds the amended contentions inadequate, its obligation to provide invalidity contentions under the Local Rules is STAYED pending further order of the court. Dated: October 29, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-REFS\BENDER V. INTERSIL\DISC2.ORD.wpd

2