Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 77

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 76 Stipulated Motion to Extend Certain Dates Relating to Claims Construction. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken, on 12/10/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2009) Modified on 12/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) bwecker@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205) gbishop@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 247-6000 Tel. (415) 247-6001 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff, Case No. CV 09-1224 CW STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES RELATING TO CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MICROSOFT CORPORATION; 17 IANYWHERE SOLUTIONS, INC.; SYBASE, INC.; and SYMANTEC CORPORATION 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to stipulation by and between the parties hereto, plaintiff BackWeb 23 Technologies, Ltd. ("BackWeb") and defendants Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"); and 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES CASE NO. CV 09-1224 CW Symantec Corporation ("Symantec"), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court set the dates of certain events relating to claims construction in this patent case, on the dates set forth below. 1 1 An Initial Case Management Conference was held in this case on September 15, 2009. 2 Prior to the conference, on September 9, 2009, the parties submitted their Joint Case 3 Management Statement, which set forth proposed pre-trial dates, including dates for certain 4 activities relating to claim construction provided by Patent Local Rules 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5 6 7 8 9 4.4. To the recollection of the parties, at the conference the Court approved the proposed dates for events provided-for in the afore-mentioned Patent Local Rules, although these dates were not set forth in the Minute Order and Case Management Order filed September 22, 2009. The parties wish to set dates for these activities that are extended approximately six 10 weeks from the dates proposed in the Joint Case Management Statement. The parties submit 11 that the case schedule set by the Court in its September 22, 2009 order allows times for the 12 extended dates, because therein the Court set a date of November 1, 2010 for the filing, all in 13 14 15 16 one brief, of plaintiff's dispositive motions, Claims Constructions briefs and motion to limit or exclude expert testimony. The parties represent that this extension will not delay any dates set forth in the Court's order. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the Court 17 order the following deadlines for the following case events: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES CASE NO. CV 09-1224 CW Event Exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction [Pat. L.R. 4.1.a-b.] Simultaneous Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Preliminary Identifications of Extrinsic Evidence [Pat. L.R. 4.2.a-b.] Simultaneous Exchange of Responsive Claim Constructions Filing of Joint Claim Chart, Worksheet and Hearing Statement [Pat. L.R. 4.3] Completion of Claim Construction Discovery [Pat. L.R. 4.4] Dates January 11, 2010 February 1, 2010 February 17, 2010 February 23, 2010 October 22, 2010 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 1, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ George F. Bishop___________________ SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) bwecker@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205) gbishop@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 247-6000 Tel. (415) 247-6001 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. /s/ Ulysses S. Hui________________________ ERIC L. WESENBERG (CA Bar No. 139696) ewesenberg@orrick.com ULYSSES S. HUI (CA Bar No. 225521) uhui@orrick.com HAO (HELEN) LI (CA Bar No. 247420) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 614-7400 Tel. (650) 614-7401 Fax M. PATRICIA THAYER (CA Bar No. 90818) pthayer@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 (415) 773-5700 Tel. (415) 773-5759 Fax STEPHEN P. MCGRATH (CA Bar No. 202696) stevemcg@microsoft.com MICROSOFT CORPORAITON STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES CASE NO. CV 09-1224 CW 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052-6399 (425) 882-8080 Attorneys for Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION /s/ Christopher Freeman_________________ SEAN S. PAK seanpak@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 DAVID A. NELSON davenelson@quinnemanuel.com CHRISTOPHER FREEMAN chrisfreeman@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 250 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 230 Chicago, IL 60606 Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order 45X.B, I, George F. Bishop, attest that the above 20 signatories for the Defendants have concurred and consented to the filing of this document. 21 DATED: December 1, 2009 22 /s/ George F. Bishop______________ 23 George F. Bishop 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES CASE NO. CV 09-1224 CW 4 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT The parties to this action will comply with the dates set forth in the accompanying 3 Stipulated Motion. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES CASE NO. CV 09-1224 CW 10 Dated: December ___, 2009 ________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?