Yufa v. TSI Incorporated

Filing 145

ORDER Striking Plaintiff's 144 Opposition to Defendant's 142 Motion for Administrative Relief as moot. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/8/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)

1
2

United States District Court
Northern District of California

3
4
5
6

ALEKSANDR L. YUFA,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

v.
TSI INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No.: CV 09-01315-KAW
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S 11/4/13
OPPOSITION TO TSI INCORPORATED’S
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
AS MOOT
(Dkt. No. 144)

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On October 30, 2013, Plaintiff filed a document, dated October 29, 2013, titled

13

“Aleksandr L. Yufa’s Statement RE: Court Order (Doc. 126) of August 21, 2013 regarding

14

Discovery Letter (Doc. 124).” (“10/29/13 Statement”, Dkt. No. 141). On November 1, 2013,

15

Defendant filed a motion for administrative relief pursuant to seeking permission to respond to

16

Plaintiff’s Statement. (Dkt. No. 142.)

17

On November 1, 2013, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s motion for relief on

18

the grounds that a response was unnecessary, and instructing the parties to meet and confer

19

regarding Plaintiff’s First Set of Request for Production, and, if necessary, to prepare and file a

20

joint discovery letter in accordance with the Court’s Standing Order by no later than November

21

15, 2013. (Dkt. No. 143.)

22

On November 7, 2013, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion for

23

administrative relief, dated November 4, 2013. (Dkt. No. 144.) After a review of Plaintiff’s

24

opposition, it is clear that it was submitted prior to his receipt of the Court’s November 1 order.

25

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s opposition is stricken on the grounds that it is moot.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

DATE: November 8, 2013

___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge