Yufa v. Particle Measuring Systems, Inc.
Filing
104
ORDER Continuing Stay. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamitlon on 04/14/2017. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (kcS, COURT STAFF).
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
ALEKSANDR L. YUFA,
6
7
8
Case No. 09-cv-01388-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER CONTINUING STAY
PARTICLE MEASURING SYSTEMS,
INC.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 102, 103
Defendant.
9
10
On February 18, 2015, the court granted a stay in this case based on the
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
possibility of the patents-in-suit being assigned to a receiver and sold at auction in order
12
to satisfy a judgment in another suit involving plaintiff. Dkt. 90. Since then, the parties
13
have filed status reports every six months seeking to continue the stay; the court has
14
repeatedly ordered the stay to continue as the appointment of a receiver was appealed.
15
Dkt. 92, 95, 98, 101.
16
On April 7, 2017, pro se plaintiff Alexsandr Yufa filed an updated status statement
17
requesting that the court continue the stay. Dkt. 102. In Yufa v. TSI Incorporated, No.
18
4:09-cv-1315 KAW, the Federal Circuit has now affirmed the order to appoint a receiver
19
for Yufa’s patents. Id. Dkt. 250. However, no assignment has yet taken place.
20
Defendant Particle Measuring Systems, Inc. agrees that an additional stay is appropriate.
21
Dkt. 103.
22
The court agrees that the stay should remain in place. The parties shall file an
23
updated status statement no later than six months from the date of this order, apprising
24
the court as to whether the patents have been assigned.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2017
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?