Optimumpath LLC v. Belkin International Inc et al
Filing
290
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 230 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7 OPTIMUMPATH, L.L.C.,
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1398-CW
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 711 AND 79-5 TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL (Docket No. 230)
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
10 BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., CISCOLINKSYS, LLC, D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC.
NETGEAR, INC. AND SMC NETWORKS,
11
INC.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02099.51359/3791807.1
Case No. 4:09-CV-1398-CW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Defendants Belkin International, Inc., Cisco-Linksys, LLC, D-Link Systems, Inc.,
NETGEAR, Inc., and SMC Networks, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) have submitted an
administrative request to seal portions of their Reply in Support of Motion to Preclude Plaintiff
From Asserting a Theory of Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents and To Strike
Portions of Dr. Dahlberg’s Expert Report Discussing the Doctrine of Equivalents. The request is
made on the basis that the documents sought to be sealed contain information designated as
protected material pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order entered on February 10, 2010.
Having considered Defendants’ request, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
GRANTS Defendants’ Miscellaneous Administrative Request to File Documents Under Seal and
ORDERS that portions of Defendants’ Reply to Motion to Preclude be filed under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: 9/2/2011
15
16
17
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02099.51359/3791807.1
Case No. 4:09-CV-1398-CW
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?